RAMOS v. RAMIREZ


31 A.D.3d 294 (2006)

818 N.Y.S.2d 916

JUAN RAMOS, Respondent, v. JAIME RAMIREZ, ESQ., et al., Defendants, and ALEXANDER MINELLA, ESQ., et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

July 13, 2006.


Notwithstanding the lenient standard for reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (see Leon v Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83 [1994]), plaintiff's fraud cause of action against defendant Minella must be dismissed. A fraud claim must be pleaded with particularity (CPLR 3016 [b]; New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. v St. Barnabas Community Health Plan,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases