1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 142 P.3d
  5. 142 P.3d 179 (2006)
 

TELLER v. APM TERMINALS PACIFIC, LTD.

No. 33663-4-II.

142 P.3d 179 (2006)

Gordon E. TELLER, Respondent, v. APM TERMINALS PACIFIC, LTD., Appellants, Maersk Line, Limited, a Washington corporation; Maersk, Inc., a Washington corporation; Maersk Equipment Service Company, a Washington corporation; Maersk Customs Services, Inc., a Washington corporation; Maersk Logistics USA, Inc., a Washington corporation; CSX Lines, a Washington company; Jane Doe and John Doe, wife and husband and the marital community composed thereof, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

August 22, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip Lempriere, Catharine M. Morisset, Keesal Young & Logan, Seattle, WA, for Petitioners.

William D. Hochberg, Grady B. Martin, Law Office of William D. Hochberg, Edmonds, WA, for Respondent.

VAN DEREN, A.C.J.

¶ 1 APM Terminals Pacific, Ltd. (APM Terminals) appeals the superior court's reversal of the district court's order of summary judgment of dismissal of Gordon E. Teller's second amended complaint, which was about five months after the statute of limitations expired, and which named APM Terminals as a defendant for the first time. We reverse the superior court and affirm the district court's summary judgment dismissal of Teller's action and remand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases