Sandra CABA and Floy Jones, Respondents on Review,
v.
Anthony J. BARKER, Petitioner on Review.
Supreme Court of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted May 9, 2005.
Reassigned September 20, 2006.
Decided October 19, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Brian R. Talcott, Dunn Carney Allen Higgins & Tongue LLP, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the briefs were Thomas H. Tongue and Madeleine S. Campbell.
Thomas W. Sondag, Lane Powell PC, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents on review.
Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, RIGGS, DE MUNIZ, BALMER, and KISTLER, Justices.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
GILLETTE, J.
In this case, two residual legatees1 of a will brought an action against the lawyer who drafted it. Plaintiffs assert that, in addition to their status as residual legatees, they are the intended third-party beneficiaries of what they characterize as an "implied" promise that they allege that defendant made to testator in connection with that will. Plaintiffs further allege that defendant failed to carry out the terms of his...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
