The court correctly ruled that until the facts of the underlying action are established, it cannot be concluded as a matter of law that there is no possible factual or legal basis on which defendant might eventually be held obligated to indemnify plaintiff under any provision of the insurance policies (see Servidone Constr. Corp. v Security Ins. Co. of Hartford,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LOVE PICIN, INC. v. CERTAIN INTERESTED UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON,
35 A.D.3d 282 (2006)
827 N.Y.S.2d 34
LOVE PICIN, INC., Trading as THE COYOTE UGLY SALOON, Respondent, v. CERTAIN INTERESTED UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 19, 2006.
Decided December 19, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
