1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 209 S.W.3d
  5. 209 S.W.3d 98 (2006)
 

BULANEK v. WESTTEX 66 PIPELINE CO.

No. 04-0011.

209 S.W.3d 98 (2006)

Donnie BULANEK, Jacko Garrett, and Nancy Garrett, Petitioners, v. WESTTEX 66 PIPELINE COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

December 1, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Noel, Houston, Richard L. McElya, Angleton, for petitioner.

Frederick D. Junkin, J. Mark Breeding, Paul S. Radich, Andrews & Kurth L.L.P., Houston, Joseph Patterson, Patterson & Edquist, Angleton, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Zwahr, 88 S.W.3d 623, 630-31 (Tex.2002), we reversed a condemnation award, holding that the testimony of the landowners' expert, Brad Kangieser, was irrelevant and inadmissible because he "relied on [the] condemnation in establishing a separate economic unit and in assigning a value to that unit," and "failed to apply the before-and-after valuation method, which would have required him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases