1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 130 P.3d
  5. 130 P.3d 176 (2006)
 

MENDOZA v. STATE

No. 43390.

130 P.3d 176 (2006)

Juan Manuel MENDOZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

March 16, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amesbury & Schutt and David C. Amesbury and John P. Parris, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

George Chanos, Attorney General, Carson City; David J. Roger, District Attorney, and James Tufteland, Chief Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

Before the Court En Banc.

OPINION

MAUPIN, J.

In this appeal, we clarify the criteria for dual convictions for kidnapping and robbery when such charges arise from a single course of conduct. We also resolve questions concerning custodial statements to authorities under Miranda v. Arizona,1 where the accused has not explicitly stated the intent to waive the right to counsel, and the discretion of the district court in limiting cross-examination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases