1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 26 A.D.3d
  5. 26 A.D.3d 279 (2006)
 

ADINGRA v. HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT

26 A.D.3d 279 (2006)

810 N.Y.S.2d 50

RUTH ADINGRA, Appellant, v. HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 23, 2006.

The motion was properly reconsidered on the basis of newly submitted evidence (Kasem v. Price-Rite Off. & Home Furniture, 21 A.D.3d 799, 801 [2005]). The new submissions made it clear that no inference could be drawn that the puddle of water on which plaintiff slipped was either created by defendant or had been on the floor for a sufficient length of time to permit defendant to discover and remedy it. There were no prior complaints...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases