1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 110 Ohio
  5. 110 Ohio St.3d 194 (2006)
 

HORTMAN v. MIAMISBURG

Nos. 2005-1351 and 2005-1361.

110 Ohio St.3d 194 (2006)

2006-Ohio-4251

HORTMAN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CITY OF MIAMISBURG ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 30, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick J. Conboy II, for appellees.

Surdyk, Dowd & Turner Co., L.P.A., Robert J. Surdyk, and Kevin A. Lantz, for appellant.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J.

{¶ 1} Today this court must decide whether the doctrines of equitable estoppel and promissory estoppel are applicable against a political subdivision when the political subdivision is engaged in the performance of a government function. For the reasons that follow, we hold that they are not, and we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and enter judgment for the city of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases