1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 195 S.W.3d
  5. 195 S.W.3d 96 (2006)
 

WILHELM v. FLORES

No. 04-0208.

195 S.W.3d 96 (2006)

Curtis R. WILHELM, Petitioner, v. Dora Elia FLORES, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 9, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce W. Hodge, Hodge James & Garza, L.L.P., Harlingen, Guy H. Allison, Corpus Christi, Dana R. Allison, Brownsville, The Allison Law Firm, William L. Hubbard, McAllen, for Petitioner.

Francisco J. Rodriguez, Rodriguez Tovar & De Los Santos, LLP, Keith C. Livesay, Livesay Law Office, McAllen, Rogelio Garcia, Houston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The issue in this case is whether a seller of hived bees owes a commercial buyer's employees or agents any duty to warn them of the dangers associated with bee stings or to protect them from being stung. The court of appeals held that such a duty exists. 133 S.W.3d 726, 734 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003). We disagree.

Petitioner Curtis Wilhelm kept bees as a hobby, but he decided to sell his fourteen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases