WHITAKER, APPELLANT,
v.
M.T. AUTOMOTIVE, INC., D.B.A. MONTROSE TOYOTA, APPELLEE.
Supreme Court of Ohio.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted January 11, 2006.
Decided November 8, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Young & McDowall, Laura K. McDowall, and Rocco P. Yeargin, for appellant.
Brouse McDowell, Clair E. Dickinson, and Joseph T. Dattilo, for appellee.
Willis & Willis Co., L.P.A., Mark C. Willis, and Todd L. Willis, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.
Burdge Law Office Co., L.P.A., and Ronald L. Burdge; and Thomas Domonoske, urging reversal for amicus curiae National Association of Consumer Advocates.
Cooper & Elliott, L.L.C., David A. Brown, and Andrew J. Sonderman, urging affirmance for amicus curiae the Ohio Automobile Dealers Association and Ohio Council of Retail Merchants.
Supreme Court of Ohio.
LANZINGER, J.
{¶ 1} We accepted this case as a discretionary appeal to clarify what damages are available under R.C. 1345.09, the private-remedy section of Ohio's Consumer Sales Practice Act ("CSPA").
Facts
{¶ 2} This dispute, which is between appellant, Craig Whitaker, and appellee, M.T. Automotive, Inc., a car dealership doing business as Montrose...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
