1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 40 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 40 Cal.Rptr.3d 244 (2006)
 

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA v. NTS TECHNICAL

No. B169596.

40 Cal.Rptr.3d 244 (2006)

137 Cal.App.4th 264

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NTS TECHNICAL SYSTEMS et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

February 3, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maher & Maher, Michael K. Maher, Anaheim, for Defendants and Appellants.

Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Carl K. Newton, City Attorney, Brian A. Pierik, Camarillo, Alan A. Sozio, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

BOREN, P.J.

NTS Technical Systems, Inc. (NTS), and ETCR, Inc. (ETCR) (collectively, appellants),1 appeal from the judgment entered in an eminent domain action by the City of Santa Clarita (City). They contend the judgment must be reversed, because the trial court erred in finding they failed to show any qualifying goodwill loss; in excluding expert valuation testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases