IN THE MATTER OF CULHANE v. HOLT


28 A.D.3d 251 (2006)

813 N.Y.S.2d 400

In the Matter of ERIN CULHANE, Respondent, v. PETER HOLT, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 11, 2006.


The Magistrate did not violate the mandate of Family Court Act § 413 (1) (b) (5) (i) when he based respondent's income on the average of his projected earnings for 2004 and 2005. While Family Court Act § 413 (1) (b) (5) (i) provides that the relevant income figure is the "gross (total) income as should have been or should be reported in the most recent federal income tax return," nothing in the statute prohibits reliance upon partial information from a tax year...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases