MATTER OF THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST v. GAMIEL


34 A.D.3d 244 (2006)

824 N.Y.S.2d 237

In the Matter of THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, Respondent, v. RUCHAMA GAMIEL, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided November 9, 2006.


Respondent's notice of her claim for supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorists (SUM) benefits under the SUM coverage she purchased (see Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [2]), provided to petitioner insurer at least 16 months after respondent's receipt of notice that the tortfeasor's insurer was insolvent and in liquidation was not provided "as soon as practicable," as required by the policy, and was untimely as a matter of law (see Great Canal Realty Corp. v Seneca...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases