1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 49 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 49 Cal.Rptr.3d 216 (2006)
 

NEISENDORF v. LEVI STRAUSS & CO.

No. A109826.

49 Cal.Rptr.3d 216 (2006)

143 Cal.App.4th 509

Barbara J. NEISENDORF, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LEVI STRAUSS & CO. et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Four.

August 29, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schneider & Wallace and Todd M. Schneider, Carolyn H. Cottrell and Zachary R. Cincotta, San Francisco, The Lucas Law Firm and Kathleen M. Lucas, San Francisco, Law Office of Ted. W. Pelletier and Ted W. Pelletier, for Appellant.

Littler Mendelson and Margaret Hart Edwards, San Francisco, Michael Mankes and Paul R. Lynd, San Francisco, Levi Strauss & Co. and Tracy M. Preston, for Respondent.

RUVOLO, P.J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Following 14 weeks of medical leave, appellant Barbara Neisendorf's at-will employment with respondent Levi Strauss & Co. (LS&Co.) was terminated. She filed suit, claiming, among other things, that the termination of her employment violated the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) (Gov.Code, § 12945.2; 2 Cal.Code Regs., tit. 2, § 7297, subd. (b)) and the Fair Employment

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases