There is at least an issue of fact as to whether the contract claim was viable as a promise to achieve a particular result separate from the breach of general professional standards in defendants' field and thus not duplicative of the legal malpractice cause of action (see Matter of R.M. Kliment & Frances Halsband, Architects [McKinsey & Co., Inc.],
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SARASOTA, INC. v. KURZMAN & EISENBERG, LLP
28 A.D.3d 237 (2006)
814 N.Y.S.2d 94
SARASOTA, INC., as Successor and Assignee of F.D.I.C., Respondent, v. KURZMAN & EISENBERG, LLP, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 6, 2006.
April 6, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
