1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 28 A.D.3d
  5. 28 A.D.3d 231 (2006)
 

PEOPLE v. ROSALES

28 A.D.3d 231 (2006)

811 N.Y.S.2d 666

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. IAN ROSALES, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 6, 2006.

The court properly exercised its discretion in permitting limited references to the fact that, at the time of an interview wherein he made admissions, defendant was incarcerated in Ohio for unspecified reasons. These references were necessary to provide context for other evidence and they could not be redacted without impairing the jury's understanding of the other evidence (see People v. Vails, 43 N.Y.2d 364 [1977]). To the extent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases