No triable factual issue is raised as to whether defendant Kallimini was intoxicated or impaired at the time of his altercation with plaintiff, much less as to whether defendant nightclub Chaos furnished Kallimini with alcohol or caused him to become intoxicated prior to the altercation. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly granted dismissing plaintiff's claims against Chaos under General Obligations Law §§ 11-100 and 11-101 (see Sherman v. Robinson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MURPHY v. CHAOS
26 A.D.3d 231 (2006)
810 N.Y.S.2d 39
JOSEPH MURPHY, Appellant, v. CHAOS et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 16, 2006.
February 16, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.