The motion was properly denied for failure to demonstrate the materiality of the anticipated testimony of the witnesses on whose convenience the motion is based (see Cardona v Aggressive Heating,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RAYNOR v. HK SYSTEMS, INC.
30 A.D.3d 226 (2006)
815 N.Y.S.2d 825
STEVEN RAYNOR, Respondent, v. HK SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 13, 2006.
June 13, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.