The police testimony on which the adjudication was based was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant entered a public housing building unlawfully (Penal Law § 140.10 [e]), or that he remained in such a building unlawfully (Penal Law § 140.10 [f]). There was no evidence showing that appellant had entered the building through an entrance at which signs were posted giving requisite notice that his entry was unlawful; nor was there any evidence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.