1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 30 A.D.3d
  5. 30 A.D.3d 215 (2006)
 

ORTIZ v. NEW YORK MEDICAL GROUP, P.C.

30 A.D.3d 215 (2006)

817 N.Y.S.2d 244

MARGARET ORTIZ et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 13, 2006.

The continuous treatment doctrine is not applicable to toll the running of the statutory period with respect to the claims against respondent doctors. The record establishes that the treatment relied upon by plaintiff to toll the statutory period was not for the particular condition giving rise to the instant malpractice claims (see Prinz-Schwartz v Levitan, 17 A.D.3d 175, 178 [2005]; ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases