The various evidentiary rulings at issue on appeal were proper exercises of the court's discretion. The court properly excluded irrelevant, collateral and duplicative evidence, and its rulings had no adverse effect on defendant's right to present a defense and confront witnesses (see Crane v. Kentucky,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.