DECANA INC. v. CONTOGOURIS


27 A.D.3d 207 (2006)

810 N.Y.S.2d 453

DECANA INC. et al., Respondents, v. SPYRO C. CONTOGOURIS et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 2, 2006.


The motion court properly exercised its discretion in granting plaintiffs' disqualification motion (see Hirschfeld v Stahl, 194 A.D.2d 388 [1993]). Having presided over three matters involving these parties, the court properly determined that the issues raised in the proceedings were substantially related and that the interests of the current client and former client are materially adverse (see Jamaica Pub. Serv. Co. v AIU Ins...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases