In challenging the sufficiency and weight of the evidence convicting him of intentional murder, defendant argues that in performing our legal and factual review, this Court should employ the standards applicable to a completely circumstantial case. However, this conviction was not based entirely on circumstantial evidence, and no such instruction was requested by defendant or delivered by the court. In any event, regardless of the standard of review, we conclude that the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
