1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 35 A.D.3d
  5. 35 A.D.3d 194 (2006)
 

INWOOD SECURITY ALARM, INC. v. 606 RESTAURANT, INC.

35 A.D.3d 194 (2006)

826 N.Y.S.2d 214

INWOOD SECURITY ALARM, INC., Doing Business as McGIVNEY BROTHERS LOCKSMITHS, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. 606 RESTAURANT, INC., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 7, 2006.

The issue of the propriety of the trial court's ruling precluding plaintiff's expert from testifying is not preserved for our review, no objection having been made to the ruling at trial (see e.g. Scherer v Equitable Life Assur. Socy. of U.S., 299 A.D.2d 301 [2002], lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 609 [2003]). Were we to consider plaintiff's argument, we would find it without merit. Plaintiff's CPLR...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases