The motion court correctly concluded that article 16.1 of the argon supply agreement precluded notice of termination until on or after September 1, 2006, and thus, that plaintiff's notice of termination, dated July 26, 2005, was ineffective. In reaching this conclusion, the motion court adopted an interpretation of the disputed provision consistent with ordinary usage and the principle of noscitur a sociis (see Popkin v Security Mut. Ins. Co. of N.Y.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
AIR LIQUIDE LARGE INDUSTRIES U.S. LP v. PRAXAIR, INC.
35 A.D.3d 188 (2006)
826 N.Y.S.2d 219
AIR LIQUIDE LARGE INDUSTRIES U.S. LP, Appellant, v. PRAXAIR, INC., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 7, 2006.
Decided December 7, 2006.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
