1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 136 P.3d
  5. 136 P.3d 84 (2006)
 

BRIDSTON v. PANTHER CRUSHING CO., INC.

01-0845-E2; A122275.

136 P.3d 84 (2006)

206 Or. App. 178

James M. BRIDSTON and Susan M. Knapp-Bridston, husband and wife, Respondents, v. PANTHER CRUSHING CO., INC., an Oregon corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 31, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Bolen, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Hornecker, Cowling, Hassen & Heysell, L.L.P., and Joseph E. Kellerman.

Bryan E. Blodgett, Medford, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and SCHUMAN, Judges.

WOLLHEIM, J.

Defendant Panther Crushing Co., Inc., appeals from a judgment of the trial court granting plaintiffs James Bridston and Susan Knapp-Bridston a prescriptive easement to a road on defendant's property. Defendant assigns error to the trial court's conclusion that it failed to rebut the presumption of adverse use. On de novo review, R & C Ranch, LLC v. Kunde, 177 Or.App. 304, 310, 33 P.3d 1011...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases