PER CURIAM.
The state properly concedes that, as a result of a scrivener's error, the judgment and sentence in Case No. 91-7125 erroneously indicates that appellant was sentenced to prison on a violation of probation charge as to both Counts II and III, rather than solely as to Count III. However, appellant's claim that he is entitled to additional jail credit for time served is without merit. Echols v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.