PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse.
The order states that the defendant's motion is successive in that it raises issues which could or should have been raised in prior post-conviction relief motions. We note that there is no proscription against filing successive rule 3.800(a) motions. As discussed in Pleasure v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.