1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 888 A.2d
  5. 888 A.2d 1283 (2006)
 

STATE v. BIRKENMEIER

888 A.2d 1283 (2006)

185 N.J. 552

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce BIRKENMEIER, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 19, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher A. Alliegro, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Mark F. Casazza, Hazlet, argued the cause for respondent (Rudnick, Addonizio & Pappa, attorneys).

Justice RIVERA-SOTO delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal requires that we determine, under the circumstances presented, the propriety of a vehicle stop and the searches that followed. Defendant Bruce Birkenmeier asserts that, given the quantum of information possessed by the police at the time, the police were required to obtain a search warrant before stopping and searching his car and thereafter securing consent to search his house. The State argues that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases