COM. v. McCLINTIC


909 A.2d 1241 (2006)

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. John McCLINTIC, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided November 22, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl Baker, Esq., Peter Rosalsky, Esq., Philadelphia, for John McClintic.

Hugh J. Burns, Esq., Michael Erlich, Philadelphia, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER and BALDWIN, JJ.


OPINION

Justice BAER.

This Court granted review of the order of the Superior Court affirming Appellant's judgment of sentence to consider whether, under the Sentencing Code's Three Strikes Law, Appellant should have been subject to a sentence enhancement for each crime of violence committed during a single criminal episode. See 42 Pa. C.S. § 9714(a)(2). For the following reasons, we answer this question in the negative, and thus vacate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases