1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 920 So.2d
  5. 920 So.2d 1224 (2006)
 

BRIFIEL v. STATE

No. 4D05-4210.

920 So.2d 1224 (2006)

Prosper BRIFIEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 22, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Lamos of Law Offices of David M. Lamos, Fort Pierce, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motions for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, because they were impermissibly filed beyond the two-year time limitation. However, as it appears the trial court has never ruled on appellant's supplemental motion filed March 16, 2004, our affirmance is without prejudice to obtaining a ruling on the supplemental motion.

Affirmed.

WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases