JOHNSON v. BABCOCK

03C-13019; A124778.

136 P.3d 77 (2006)

206 Or. App. 217

Dwayne JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Gary D. BABCOCK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 31, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marianne Dugan argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was Facaros & Dugan.

Janet M. Schroer, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Cecil A. Reniche-Smith, Portland, and Hoffman, Hart & Wagner, LLP.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.


ORTEGA, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing, on defendant's ORCP 21 A(8) motion, plaintiff's claim for legal malpractice. The issue on appeal is whether, in a malpractice action arising from legal representation in a criminal matter, a plaintiff sufficiently pleads the required element of harm when he alleges that, as a result of his attorney's negligence, he received a legally impermissible sentence and later obtained federal habeas corpus relief from that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases