1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 895 A.2d
  5. 895 A.2d 1234 (2006)
 

SHULAS v. ESTABROOK

895 A.2d 1234 (2006)

385 N.J. Super. 91

Walter SHULAS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joseph ESTABROOK and Patricia Estabrook, Defendants-Appellants, v. B.B.J., Inc., Third-Party Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leary, Bride, Tinker & Moran, Cedar Knolls, attorneys for appellants (Walter E. Monaghan, on the brief).

Harold J. Gerr, Highland Park, attorney for respondent.

Before Judges FALL, C.S. FISHER and MINIMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FISHER, J.A.D.

In this matter, we consider whether the trial judge erred in granting a voluntary dismissal of this action and in permitting plaintiff to pursue an identical, newly-filed action when plaintiff's purpose in seeking a voluntary dismissal was to eviscerate the discovery end date, moot defendant's motion for summary judgment and extinguish an imminent trial date. Because the order failed to meet the requirements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases