1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 913 A.2d
  5. 913 A.2d 1189 (2006)
 

HICKS v. STATE

No. 360, 2005.

913 A.2d 1189 (2006)

Ricky HICKS, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: December 6, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Brady, Esquire, of Brady, Richardson, Beauregard & Chasanov, Georgetown, Delaware; for Appellant.

Kim Ayvazian, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, Georgetown, Delaware; for Appellee.

Before STEELE, Chief Justice, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices.

JACOBS, Justice.

Ricky Hicks ("Hicks"), the defendant-below, appeals from a Superior Court judgment of conviction following a jury trial. Hicks claims that the Superior Court reversibly erred in three respects, namely: (i) by denying Hicks' motion for a new trial claiming newly discovered evidence; (ii) by excluding evidence of a prior crime committed by the State's trial witness; and (iii) by denying Hicks' request to impeach the State's expert.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases