There is no material difference between the original and proposed amended complaints. In the original, plaintiff alleged that defendants advised that if plaintiff's opponent in the underlying action objected to plaintiff's request for reimbursement of executive bonuses from the escrow account set up in the underlying settlement agreement, an arbitrator would determine a reasonable bonus request, but that defendants never advised plaintiff of "the risks of arbitration," causing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
