1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 935 So.2d
  5. 935 So.2d 1140 (2006)
 

EASY REACH, INC. v. HUB CITY BRUSH, INC.

No. 2005-CA-00952-COA.

935 So.2d 1140 (2006)

EASY REACH, INC. (Formerly Easy Reach Brush, Inc.) and Brant L. Cedotal, Appellants v. HUB CITY BRUSH, INC., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Mississippi.

August 8, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Christopher Wood, attorney for appellants.

Lawrence Cary Gunn, Hattiesburg, attorney for appellee.

Before MYERS, P.J., IRVING and ROBERTS, JJ.

IRVING, J., for the Court.

¶ 1. Brant Cedotal, owner of Easy Reach, Inc., sued on behalf of himself and Easy Reach for a declaratory judgment to void a non-competition clause that bars Easy Reach from manufacturing its own brushes. The Forrest County Chancery Court declined to find that the non-competition agreement was invalid, and entered a judgment denying relief to Easy Reach and Brant. Believing the court's decision in error, Easy Reach and Brant appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases