SHIM v. RUTGERS


896 A.2d 1118 (2006)

385 N.J. Super. 200

Ezrina SHIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RUTGERS—THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 2, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Justin H. Park, Philadelphia, PA, argued the cause for appellant (Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, attorneys; Mr. Park, on the brief).

Kathleen A. Walsh, Roseland, argued the cause for respondent (Lowenstein Sandler, attorneys; Gavin J. Rooney, of counsel; Ms. Walsh, on the brief).

Before Judges WEFING, WECKER, and FUENTES.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, J.A.D.

Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey ("Rutgers") charges its undergraduate students a lower tuition if they are "domiciled" in New Jersey. Plaintiff Ezrina Shim appeals from Rutgers' determination that she is not domiciled in this State, because she is financially dependent on her parents who reside in Korea. Rutgers reached this conclusion despite the fact that plaintiff: (1) is over the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases