Although plaintiff claimed that her trip and fall was attributable to a carpet defect, she has abandoned that theory of liability and now contends that her accident was solely attributable to her heeding the "instruction" of one of defendant's employees to "hurry." The employee, however, breached no legally cognizable duty by suggesting, or even urging, that plaintiff hurry. In any event, no triable issue has been raised as to whether haste was the cause of plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
