1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 907 A.2d
  5. 907 A.2d 1083 (2006)
 

FRITZ v. WRIGHT

907 A.2d 1083 (2006)

Darla FRITZ and Gordon Fritz, Appellants, v. Hazel WRIGHT, Carolyn Temple, Bonnie Stuart, and Samuel Wright, Individually and Doing Business as Wright's Lane Properties, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided October 18, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nina B. Shapiro, Esq., for Darla Fritz and Gordon Fritz.

Gregory Buchwald Heller, Esq., for amicus curiae PA Trial Lawyers Association.

Peter Francis Schuchman, Jr., Esq., Wyomissing, for Hazel Wright, et al.

BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER and BALDWIN, JJ.

OPINION

Justice BAER.

Appellant Gordon Fritz1 appeals from an order of the Superior Court reversing the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County denying a motion for a mistrial filed by Hazel Wright, Carolyn Temple, Bonnie Stuart, and Samuel Wright (Appellees). The issue before this Court is whether 42 Pa.C.S. § 5104(b) and Article I, Section 6, of the Pennsylvania Constitution require that the same ten...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases