1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 889 A.2d
  5. 889 A.2d 1099 (2006)
 

PARDO v. DOMINGUEZ

889 A.2d 1099 (2006)

382 N.J. Super. 489

Cristina PARDO, Plaintiff, and Claudia Capilla, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Omar DOMINGUEZ and Antonio Dominguez, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard LaBarbiera argued the cause for appellant Claudia Capilla (LaBarbiera, Jones & Martinez, attorneys; Mr. LaBarbiera, on the brief).

Rachel A. Long argued the cause for respondents Omar Dominguez and Antonio Dominguez (Kramkowski, Lynes, Fabricant & Bressler, attorneys; Ms. Long, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges STERN, PARKER and LIHOTZ.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

STERN, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Claudia Capilla, appeals from an order entered on February 16, 2005, dismissing her complaint for failure to satisfy the "limitation on lawsuit option" (frequently called the "verbal threshold"), under the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8a. A similar summary judgment motion was denied as to plaintiff Cristina...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases