1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 915 A.2d
  5. 915 A.2d 1053 (2006)
 

BRUN v. CARDOSO

915 A.2d 1053 (2006)

390 N.J. Super. 409

Marie BRUN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John CARDOSO and Celina Cardoso, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 9, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milagros C. Alvarez, Mountainside, argued the cause for appellant (Lord & Kobrin, attorneys; Ms. Alvarez, on the brief).

Steven I. Litvak, Livingston, argued the cause for respondent (Litvak & Trifiolis, attorneys; Mr. Litvak, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges KESTIN, WEISSBARD and PAYNE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WEISSBARD, J.A.D.

Once again we face the competing demands of "Best Practices"2 and the core principle of the judicial system to provide a fair trial on the merits to the litigants for whose benefit the system was designed and is maintained. We are also required to address the circumstances under which a report by a non-testifying witness interpreting a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases