1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 910 A.2d
  5. 910 A.2d 1048 (2006)
 

LLOYD v. BENSON

910 A.2d 1048 (2006)

2006 ME 129

David LLOYD et al. v. Peter BENSON III et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided: November 14, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William B. Devoe (orally), Peter D. Klein, Eaton Peabody, Bangor, for plaintiffs.

Peter R. Roy (orally), Robert W. Laffin Jr., Roy, Beardsley, Williams & Granger, LLC, Ellsworth, for defendants.

Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, DANA, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, LEVY, and SILVER, JJ.

LEVY, J.

[¶ 1] David and Vickie Lloyd appeal the entry of a judgment in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Hjelm, J.) resolving a boundary dispute in favor of Peter Benson III and Susan Rand, the owners of an abutting parcel. The Lloyds contend that the trial court erred in ruling that the deed to their parcel contained a latent ambiguity and in the manner in which it resolved the ambiguity. We affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases