PER CURIAM.
In this appeal, Appellant, a railroad company which sought to close a grade crossing used by Appellee and Appellee's tenants, argues that the trial court erred reversibly in not requiring Appellee to bear more of the cost of the liability risk associated with keeping the crossing open when the trial court decided the amount of compensation due appellant (the servient landowner) from appellee (the dominant landowner) for appellee's statutory way-of-necessity...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
