1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 907 A.2d
  5. 907 A.2d 1018 (2006)
 

INFINITY OUTDOOR, INC. v. DELAWARE AND RARITAN CANAL COMM'N

907 A.2d 1018 (2006)

388 N.J. Super. 278

INFINITY OUTDOOR, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DELAWARE AND RARITAN CANAL COMMISSION, Respondent-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 12, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey M. Hall argued the cause for appellant (Fox Rothschild, attorneys; Mr. Hall, of counsel; Catherine B. Rinaldi, Lawrenceville, on the brief.)

Lewin J. Weyl, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Anne Milgram, Acting Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael J. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Weyl, on the brief.)

Before Judges LEFELT, PARRILLO and SAPP-PETERSON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PARRILLO, J.A.D.

Petitioner Infinity Outdoor, Inc. (Infinity) appeals from a final administrative decision of the Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission (DRCC) denying its application for approval of a proposed outdoor advertising structure and for waiver of visual impact regulatory requirements. We affirm.

The proposed structure was to be a two-sided single-pole billboard, seventy-seven feet in height, showing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases