1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 858 N.E.2d
  5. 858 N.E.2d 1017 (2006)
 

HARTMAN v. KERI

No. 02A03-0603-CV-135.

858 N.E.2d 1017 (2006)

Virginia HARTMAN and Suzanne Swinehart, Appellants-Defendants, v. Dr. Gabe KERI, Appellee-Plaintiff.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

December 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen R. Orr, Stuart & Branigin LLP, Lafayette, IN, Attorney for Appellants.

Swaray E. Conteh, The Law Office of Swaray Conteh, LLC, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellee.

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Suzanne Swinehart and Virginia Hartman bring this interlocutory appeal following the trial court's denial of their motion for summary judgment. We address a single dispositive issue on review, namely, whether communications made in the course of official proceedings brought under the antiharassment policies of The Trustees of Purdue University ("Purdue") are protected by an absolute privilege.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases