PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of February 1, 2006, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not final because the claims for "other covered losses," which remain pending in the lower tribunal at this time, appear to be related to the claim resolved by the order on appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS and POLSTON...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.