PER CURIAM.
On November 28, 2005, the Court issued an order directing the appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as untimely, specifically pointing out that it was not apparent whether the appellant's motion for rehearing had effectively delayed rendition of the underlying order denying his petition for writ of mandamus.
In response, the appellant argues that his motion for rehearing was timely filed
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.