1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 436 F.3d
  5. 436 F.3d 1376 (2006)
 

BROWN v. BARBACID

Nos. 05-1119, 103,586.

436 F.3d 1376 (2006)

Michael S. BROWN, Joseph L. Goldstein, and Yuval Reiss, Appellants, v. Mariano BARBACID and Veeraswamy Manne, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 2, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Parker, Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P., of Austin, Texas, argued for appellants. With him on the brief was Rebecca Edgar Melton. Of counsel was Marcy Hogan Greer.

Madison C. Jellins, Townsend and Townsend and Crew, LLP, of Palo Alto, California, argued for appellees. With her on the brief was Steven W. Parmelee, of San Francisco, California.

Before NEWMAN, RADER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal of an invention priority determination, called a patent "interference" proceeding, returns to the Federal Circuit from the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the "Board") of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The parties are Michael Brown, Joseph Goldstein and Yuval Reiss (together "Brown") and Mariano Barbacid and Veeraswamy Manne (together "Barbacid"). The invention common to Brown and Barbacid is a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases