1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 450 F.3d
  5. 450 F.3d 1350 (2006)
 

INPRO II LICENSING, S.A.R.L. v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.

No. 05-1233.

450 F.3d 1350 (2006)

INPRO II LICENSING, S.A.R.L., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T-MOBILE USA, INC., Research in Motion Limited, and Research in Motion Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 11, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Rhoad, Dechert LLP, of Princeton, New Jersey, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Martin J. Black and Marc S. Segal, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Linda S. Resh, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees. With her on the brief were Craig D. Leavell, Jamie H. McDole, and Aaron D. Charfoos.

Before NEWMAN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court by Circuit Judge NEWMAN; additional views by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

Inpro II Licensing, S.A.R.L. appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, granting judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,523,079 (the '079 patent) in favor of T-Mobile USA, Inc., Research in Motion Limited, and Research in Motion Corporation (collectively "T-Mobile").

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases