1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 440 F.3d
  5. 440 F.3d 1354 (2006)
 

SCHOENHAUS v. GENESCO, INC.

No. 05-1278.

440 F.3d 1354 (2006)

Harold SCHOENHAUS and Richard M. Jay, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENESCO, INC. and JOHNSTON & MURPHY, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 15, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Wolfe, Jr., Blank Rome LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Brian William Higgins, of Washington, DC; Grant S. Palmer and Todd A. Schoenhaus, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Mitchell G. Stockwell, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Vaibhav P. Kadaba and Pamela C. Mallari.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, GAJARSA and LINN, Circuit Judges.

MICHEL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Harold D. Schoenhaus and Richard M. Jay appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granting summary judgment of non-infringement of their United States Patent No. 5,174,052 ("the '052 patent") to defendants Genesco, Inc. and Johnston & Murphy, Inc. Schoenhaus v. Genesco, Inc., 351 F.Supp.2d 320 (E.D.Pa.2005). The district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases